Quietly and Clearly

A tumblr by Amelia Faulks

Notes

An Open Letter to Matt Idelson

Hey Matt! Although it is true that when the internet falls into the wrong hands it becomes a vessel for the work of evil, without it, I would not have been alerted to your most recent Q & A session on the Superman Homepage, so, silver linings, right?

I would like to draw your attention to two questions in particular, and your responses to them. I’ll deal with them one by one. So, first;

‘As a female fan of Superman I find it very disheartening a certain section of this fandom are going around the internet and accusing DC creators like Rags Morales, Geoff Johns, Grant Morrison, James Robinson as woman hating. I for one love what you are doing with Superman and I don’t agree nor appreciate the unfair bashing of hard working creators. How do you begin to deal with this kind of irrational hysteria that is in no way reflective of all female fans?’

And your response;

‘That’s an awesome question, fmoon, and I wish I had a (semi) monthly prize to give you! Honestly, the only way to deal with this sort of thing is to ignore it. The internet invites all sorts of horrible commentary, accusations and rumor mongering, and it’s like that ‘cause people don’t have to sign their name to it or look you in the eye when saying it. It’s kind of the coward’s domain, in effect…’

This correspondent’s question leaves me conflicted. On the one hand, truly, I applaud it. It is, far and away, one of the best examples of strawman-argumenteering I have seen for, well, quite some time. Certainly since one of those crazy sandal-wearing, tree-hugging, paper recycling, human rights-loving types dared unveil the seismic revelation that, no, maybe people beset by bigotry, racism, sexism, small-mindedness and a tendency to litter might not make (shh, whisper it) ideal candidates for a citizen of the year award. Away from content, structurally speaking, the inclusion of ‘hard working’ is a nice, creative, adverbing flourish but, everything considered, I think it is that last leading loaded semi-rhetorical question that raises this above mere myopic filibustering to become Art.

ON THE OTHER HAND, I also cannot help but feel personally and hurtfully offended by this question- not only as a gross misrepresentation of my views but also as an uncalled for slight against my previously unimpugned and unbesmirched good character. It makes me feel sick, actually. To my very stomach. I have never EVER accused or sought to villify ANY DC creators as being woman-haters. I believe my exact words were, ‘anti-female misogynistic bastards’.

:P. My little jokes aside, Matt, and, I have to level with you here, (although it is true I do know all the words to the ‘Votes For Women’ suffragette song from Mary Poppins) I’m afraid my pitchfork-toting feminazi credentials are far from perfect, and so it is with a kind of sadness that I reveal to you I have never once engaged in ‘horrible commentary’, ‘accusations’ , or, indeed, ‘rumor mongering’ towards the good people behind DC Comics. (Except for that single occasion when I said Dan DiDio’s head reminds me of a boob, but I swear it was just that one time.)

Read more …

Filed under DC I love you But you're bringing me down

Notes

kryptoswag:

miss-mgann:

Voice actors from DC animated features and series. They did this little short and I died for three days.

Dying. Omg, I did not know he voiced the Flash.

XD

Amazing!

THIS IS INCREDIBLE

Oh man, that was so funny!

I wonder what it must feel like to sound like Superman 100% of the time!  It must feel awesome.

Ohmygosh, this is the best. thing. evs.

(Source: n0sefreckles)

Filed under wish Dana Delany was in it tho

Notes

The Future of Lois and Clark

teamclarklois:

JURGENS & GIFFEN GET PERSONAL WITH “SUPERMAN”

Giffen: Also, we will be introducing a new love interest for Clark. I don’t want to spoil it by saying who it is, but I can guarantee it will throw whatever future relationship Clark and Lois had completely off course.

Well, we’ve already seen their dynamic shifted as Lois is in a higher position at work than Clark. Is this new love triangle going to be a big part of the comic?

Jurgens: Yes! I’d say so!

Giffen: But it’s not going to be crowded. In other words, it’s not going to be new love interest, new love interest, oh, I love Lois! The Clark/Lois relationship is going to evolve as naturally as we can make it evolve. Now they’re friends, she’s his boss. He may be attracted to her, but she’s his boss. There’s awkwardness there, and it’s not an awkwardness coming from Clark. It’s the same awkwardness you would feel if you were working and you found yourself attracted to your supervisor or the CEO of the company. It’s not something you immediately act on. It’s not going to be six issues and then it’s Clark and Lois again. As a matter of fact, I honestly at this point cannot foresee when those two realize they have something for one another.

Read more at Comic Book Resources

The way the relaunch is treating Lois continues to disappoint. Going by what Jurgens and Giffen say, not only do the writers seem more interested in developing Jimmy Olsen, they’ve essentially used Lois’s new position as a boss to keep her out of the action as a reporter and off limits to Clark as a love interest. Perhaps I’ll have a more charitable reaction to all of this later, but right now I’m not pleased.

What does everyone else think?

Godsdammit, DC! I just find it so wrong, so terribly sick and also wrong that TPTB continue to throw words and phrases like, ‘Is this new love triangle going to be a big part of the comic?

Jurgens: Yes! I’d say so!’ 

around so easily and thoughtlessly when they must know that for at least a portion of the readership, the ONLY triangle anyone cares about starts and ends with Clark/Lois/Superman. Clark/Lois is about the last relationship in fiction that needs an actual third party thrown in. Frustrating.